From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf |
Date: | 2009-03-28 02:55:17 |
Message-ID: | 49CD9195.9040209@esilo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think there is a good argument that PQinitSSL(X) where X > 1 would
> work fine for more fine-grained control. The new libpq init function
> idea was interesting, but having a documented solution for
> WSAStartup()/WSACleanup() usage, we now don't have another libpq init
> use-case so it is hard to suggest a new libpq function.
If you look back through the list, the PQinit idea was offered up
several times while discussing WSA* stuff. There were few buyers. I
don't see how having or not having a documented solution for WSA* usage
would make a bit of difference.
>
> I am figuring we have to keep the current behavior and see what happens
> after 8.4; the new documentation should make the behavior clear and
> perhaps trigger other users to report suggestions.
>
>
This is not a battle I find worth fighting. But I am having trouble
staying completely quiet; I typically have this issue when I disagree :)
This patch merely documents the problem, when another fully documented
working patch "fixed" it; following the discussions on the list.
http://archives.postgresql.org//pgsql-hackers/2009-02/msg01018.php
Was this reviewed and/or rejected?
Andrew Chernow
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-03-28 03:25:29 | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-03-28 02:07:26 | Re: pgsql: Temporarily (I hope) disable flattening of IN/EXISTS sublinks |