Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Date: 2009-03-25 12:12:47
Message-ID: 49CA1FBF.2020005@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> I think the key to getting this done is
> to keep the design as simple as possible and to avoid entanglements
> with other features that may need to be designed independently and
> first.

I think the key to getting this done is to define project purpose and 
requirements before doing anything else.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Sam MasonDate: 2009-03-25 12:27:11
Subject: Re: improving concurrent transactin commit rate
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2009-03-25 11:46:53
Subject: Re: Function C and INOUT parameters

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group