Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

PATCH: Bug (2009-03:00026) Bug or not? (LIKE <table> INCLUDING DEFAULTS)

From: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: PATCH: Bug (2009-03:00026) Bug or not? (LIKE <table> INCLUDING DEFAULTS)
Date: 2009-03-18 14:08:52
Message-ID: 49C10074.3040502@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
[Changed the subject line.]

Hi Guillaume/Dave,

Please find the patch for the same.
I have come up with this solution for the bug.

Thanks Guillaume for your suggestions and help.
It helped a lot to come up with this solution.

As I could not find a direct way to integrate the new sql with the existing
sql for the ShowDependents and ShowDependency, (as per Dave's suggestion) we
added few lines at the end of these function for the solution.

Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Ashesh Vashi
> <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> wow - Thanks.
>> I think - this gives me enough idea to work on.
> Good to see you two figuring this out - I love it when a plan comes together :-p
>
> I'm going to go on and prepare the beta. This bug has been around for
> years and never got noticed before. Another few days or so won't kill
> us.
>   
-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi

EnterpriseDB INDIA: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: MSG20090300026_v1.patch
Description: text/x-diff (10.9 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2009-03-18 14:55:15
Subject: Re: PATCH: Bug (2009-03:00026) Bug or not? (LIKE <table> INCLUDING DEFAULTS)
Previous:From: svnDate: 2009-03-18 13:55:29
Subject: SVN Commit by dpage: r7726 - trunk/pgadmin3/docs/en_US

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group