Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)
Date: 2009-02-26 07:30:30
Message-ID: 49A64516.8080007@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Agreed. Simon has finished the pending items he had four weeks ago, 
>> but the code clearly isn't ready for commit yet as new issues are 
>> cropping up. And I think the way subtransactions are handled, which 
>> has been a difficult part of the patch all along, still needs more 
>> thinking.
> 
> Are there issues other than subtransactions?

Subtransactions, and transaction tracking in general. I haven't looked 
at the other parts in detail yet.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-02-26 08:04:38
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery procs
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2009-02-26 07:09:38
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group