Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Hot standby, recovery procs

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Hot standby, recovery procs
Date: 2009-02-24 08:40:12
Message-ID: 49A3B26C.5080306@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
(back to reviewing the main hot standby patch at last)

Why do we need recovery procs? AFAICS the only fields that we use are
xid and the subxid cache. Now that we also have the unobserved xids
array, why don't we use it to track all transactions in the master, not 
just the unobserved ones.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: KaiGai KoheiDate: 2009-02-24 09:03:00
Subject: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1608)
Previous:From: K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)Date: 2009-02-24 08:24:47
Subject: Sync replication tests

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group