| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pg-migrator - src: Add support for specifying port numbers. |
| Date: | 2009-02-10 17:02:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4991B32F.1070109@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> User Bmomjian wrote:
>>> Log Message:
>>> -----------
>>> Add support for specifying port numbers.
>> Hmm, I suppose we can't readily run pg_dump against a stand-alone backend?
>
> I am confused by the question; we used to default to the 5432 port
> numbers.
I was thinking that we could sidestep the whole port number question if
we didn't try to start up postmaster, and used a stand-alone backend (
postgres --single) instead.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-02-10 17:08:48 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pg-migrator - src: Add support for specifying port numbers. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-02-10 16:54:11 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pg-migrator - src: Add support for specifying port numbers. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-02-10 17:03:29 | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-02-10 16:57:17 | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf |