Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1(at)burntmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-02-04 17:37:31
Message-ID: 4989D25B.7020303@burntmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>>> Craig, what kind of "events" are you thinking about?  Triggers are 
>>> already pieces of code that run upon "certain events", namely insert, 
>>> update or delete events.  What others do you have in mind?
>> That's a good point, actually. I can't think of much you can't do with a 
>> trigger (SECURITY DEFINER if necessary) on a table. Not thinking straight.
> 
> I would find ON CONNECT/DISCONNECT triggers very useful. Probably
> this is more similar to database-wide assertions.

But a job scheduler would not help with that.  Perhaps you intended your 
comment to fall into the "pet peeves" bucket rather than the "job 
scheduler" bucket.

-- 
Guy Rouillier

In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: John DeSoiDate: 2009-02-04 17:39:42
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous:From: Iñigo BarandiaranDate: 2009-02-04 16:46:05
Subject: Re: field with Password

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group