Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1(at)burntmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-02-04 17:37:31
Message-ID: 4989D25B.7020303@burntmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>>> Craig, what kind of "events" are you thinking about? Triggers are
>>> already pieces of code that run upon "certain events", namely insert,
>>> update or delete events. What others do you have in mind?
>> That's a good point, actually. I can't think of much you can't do with a
>> trigger (SECURITY DEFINER if necessary) on a table. Not thinking straight.
>
> I would find ON CONNECT/DISCONNECT triggers very useful. Probably
> this is more similar to database-wide assertions.

But a job scheduler would not help with that. Perhaps you intended your
comment to fall into the "pet peeves" bucket rather than the "job
scheduler" bucket.

--
Guy Rouillier

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John DeSoi 2009-02-04 17:39:42 Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous Message Iñigo Barandiaran 2009-02-04 16:46:05 Re: field with Password