Re: parallel restore

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Date: 2009-01-31 13:25:07
Message-ID: 49845133.6020307@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Okay, another question --- there are two places in pg_backup_custom.c
> where the patch #ifdef's out hasSeek tests on WIN32. Why is that?
> If checkSeek() is wrong on Windows, wouldn't it be better to fix it?
>
>
>

Oh, dear. That's a hangover from before that got fixed earlier this
month. checkSeek() should now work. I will make sure it does and let you
know.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2009-01-31 13:32:59 Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-01-31 12:57:02 Re: [PATCH] Space reservation v02