| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
| Date: | 2009-01-30 23:06:12 |
| Message-ID: | 498387E4.2090706@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Joshua, Kohei-san,
>
> So, for 8.4: *if* we included in 8.4 a version of SEPostgres with all
> features *except* row-level security, would it still be useful to the
> SELinux community?
>
> I think we're just not going to work out the headache-inducing issues
> around row-level security in time for 8.4, and it seems to me that
> integrated system-level security labels at the table-and-column level
> are still very useful, even without row-level security.
>
>
Hasn't a plan for this already been posted? See
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg02407.php
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-01-30 23:13:04 | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-30 23:00:24 | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |