| From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
| Date: | 2009-01-30 22:30:16 |
| Message-ID: | 49837F78.30803@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>>> Yea, it would take some work but it is an idea.
>>>> It's *an* idea,yes. But it introduces as many (or more) problems than
>>>> it solves.
>>> Ah, but my problems might be easier solved than the row-level permission
>>> problems. ;-)
>>>
>> Or might not. Multi-partition indexes? Multi-partition uniqueness?
>> Automated moving of rows between partitions?
>
> Are you trying to make some kind of point?
>
IMVHO Josh was describing a nice-to-have TODO list for a partitions feature
in general. :-) Maybe he was saying that when they partitioning feature
is designed that they try to think of polyinstantiation as they design it :-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-01-30 22:37:17 | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-30 22:19:16 | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |