Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>
Subject: Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
Date: 2009-01-28 15:20:19
Message-ID: 498077B3.4030505@kaigai.gr.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> I'm not sure about KaiGai's feelings on this, but it strikes me that
>> adding SELinux support for the existing levels of access control in PG
>> might be straight-forward and small enough to include for 8.4 and would
>> show some commitment to this approach of "do it for PG, add SELinux
>> checks for it".  Alternatively, maybe a progression-towards-SE-PostgreSQL
>> wiki/webpage that outlines the plan, current work, what's been
>> committed, etc, that everyone reviews and agrees to?
> 
> Are you saying enlargement step-by-step, aren't you?
> At least, it is far preferable to a death punishment.
> 
> I would like to here Joshua's opinion also.

s/here/hear/g

Sorry,

-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2009-01-28 15:22:07
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-01-28 15:15:35
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning on win32.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group