>> yes. we detect that and send a warning saying that there not be any rules
> OK, so we are going to need an option to suppress that warning, even
> without the problems of upgrades and customization.
Per my response earlier, I think we really logically need an error if
the user specifies UPDATABLE.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-01-27 02:02:32|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning |
|Previous:||From: Joshua Brindle||Date: 2009-01-27 01:45:38|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2009-01-27 03:39:48|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle|
|Previous:||From: User Itagaki||Date: 2009-01-27 01:35:54|
|Subject: reorg - pg_reorg: workaround with 8.2.|