Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle
Date: 2009-01-27 01:47:24
Message-ID: 497E67AC.6000107@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Bruce,

>> yes. we detect that and send a warning saying that there not be any rules
> 
> OK, so we are going to need an option to suppress that warning, even
> without the problems of upgrades and customization.

Per my response earlier, I think we really logically need an error if 
the user specifies UPDATABLE.

--Josh

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-01-27 02:02:32
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning
Previous:From: Joshua BrindleDate: 2009-01-27 01:45:38
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2009-01-27 03:39:48
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle
Previous:From: User ItagakiDate: 2009-01-27 01:35:54
Subject: reorg - pg_reorg: workaround with 8.2.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group