Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PGCon brand

From: Melanie <melanie(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To:
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PGCon brand
Date: 2009-01-11 15:23:08
Message-ID: 496A0EDC.4000705@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
does that mean we can register commandprompt.nc and you wouldn't have a 
problem with it?  Seems like a lack of imagination to me.  If you try to 
do microsoft.us, I can promise you that you'd find your butt in court 
real fast. 

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 23:21 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>   
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>     
>
>   
>> As the owner of pgcon.us, you obviously have a different view in terms 
>> of what is and is not a brand, it is clearly within your interests to 
>> take that viewpoint.
>>     
>
> That is certainly true but pgcon.us came about *after* the others. I
> would also note that I don't actively use that domain except where
> logistically necessary.  I believe you were already sent an email
> directly to that effect.
>
>   
>> For others not aware: I am the founder of PGCon.
>>
>>     
>
> I don't think anyone is disputing that you originated PGCon.org.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>   

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2009-01-11 17:15:16
Subject: Re: pgday.org : how to federate the PgDays ?
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-01-11 14:03:36
Subject: Re: pgday.org : how to federate the PgDays ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group