Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)frogthinker(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions
Date: 2009-01-07 13:17:49
Message-ID: 4964AB7D.5030905@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> "is a natural consequence of the fact" --- There is nothing natural
>> about any of this.  Why is it a consequence and how?
>  
> How could you possibly get any of those phenomena if there are no
> concurrent transactions?

I see what you mean now, but you could write out that logic in more detail.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-01-07 13:22:52
Subject: Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2009-01-07 13:11:35
Subject: error code 25001

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group