Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: parallel restore

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Date: 2009-01-04 17:28:22
Message-ID: 4960F1B6.7060608@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>   
>> I propose to commit this unless someone wants more time for reviewing.
>>     
>
> A moment's eyeballing of the patch finds rather a lot of debugging cruft
> yet (inserted printfs, "#ifdef WIN32blah", etc); also I think the
> addition to include/port.h belongs in port/win32.h instead.
>
> More generally, though, I think it hasn't been looked at much by
> anyone (certainly not by me).
>
> 			
>   

I must have sent the wrong patch file.

I'll recheck for debugging stuff and send a new patch.

I can certainly hold off committing it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Markus WannerDate: 2009-01-04 17:29:45
Subject: Re: New patch for Column-level privileges
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-01-04 17:14:38
Subject: Re: parallel restore

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group