Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>   
>> I propose to commit this unless someone wants more time for reviewing.
>>     
>
> A moment's eyeballing of the patch finds rather a lot of debugging cruft
> yet (inserted printfs, "#ifdef WIN32blah", etc); also I think the
> addition to include/port.h belongs in port/win32.h instead.
>
> More generally, though, I think it hasn't been looked at much by
> anyone (certainly not by me).
>
> 			
>   

I must have sent the wrong patch file.

I'll recheck for debugging stuff and send a new patch.

I can certainly hold off committing it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: parallel restore at 2009-01-04 17:14:38 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Markus Wanner	Date: 2009-01-04 17:29:45
	Subject: Re: New patch for Column-level privileges
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2009-01-04 17:14:38
	Subject: Re: parallel restore