Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I propose to commit this unless someone wants more time for reviewing.
> A moment's eyeballing of the patch finds rather a lot of debugging cruft
> yet (inserted printfs, "#ifdef WIN32blah", etc); also I think the
> addition to include/port.h belongs in port/win32.h instead.
> More generally, though, I think it hasn't been looked at much by
> anyone (certainly not by me).
I must have sent the wrong patch file.
I'll recheck for debugging stuff and send a new patch.
I can certainly hold off committing it.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Markus Wanner||Date: 2009-01-04 17:29:45|
|Subject: Re: New patch for Column-level privileges|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-01-04 17:14:38|
|Subject: Re: parallel restore |