Reg Me Please wrote:
> Only one question remains in my mind:
> why the planner is not using the partial index?
> The partial index is covering 2 predicates out of the 3 used in the where
> condition. Actually there is a boolean flag (to exclude "disabled" rows),
> a timestamp (for row age) and an int8 (a FK to another table).
> The first two are in the partial index in order to exclude "disabled" and
> older rows. The int8 is the "random" key I mentioned earlier.
> So the WHERE condition reads like:
> flag AND tstz >= '2008-01-01'::timestamptz and thekey=42
> I can see in the EXPLAIN that there is no mention to the partial index.
> Please keep in mind that the table has 8+M rows, few of which are flagged,
> about 70% don't match the age limit and few dozens match the key.
> In my opinion the partial index should help a lot.
> Fahrbahn ist ein graues Band
> weisse Streifen, grüner Rand
For an index to be used the where clause must match the index. As the
index gets more complicated its less likely to be used.
I have 5 indexes on one table to answer the 5 possible ways the where
clause can look like.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Albe Laurenz||Date: 2008-12-30 15:39:23|
|Subject: Re: Load Image File From PostgreSQL DB|
|Previous:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2008-12-30 14:12:33|
|Subject: Re: [PGSQL 8.3.5] Use of a partial indexes|