Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions

From: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)frogthinker(dot)org>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions
Date: 2008-12-23 23:44:53
Message-ID: 495177F5.4060200@frogthinker.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 00:42 -0500, Emmanuel Cecchet wrote:
>   
>> I still don't 
>> get why people would use SERIALIZABLE since there is no efficient 
>> implementation of it.
>>     
>
> If they need true serializable transactions, and don't care about
> efficiency.
>   
Is there such people who really understand the thing and don't complain 
about the performance? ;-)

Happy holidays,
Emmanuel

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2008-12-24 02:39:15
Subject: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2008-12-23 21:11:00
Subject: Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group