Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_autovacuum not having enough suction ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Otto Blomqvist" <o(dot)blomqvist(at)secomintl(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum not having enough suction ?
Date: 2005-03-24 19:32:59
Message-ID: 4933.1111692779@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
"Otto Blomqvist" <o(dot)blomqvist(at)secomintl(dot)com> writes:
> Over 100'000 Index Rows removed, 300'000 unused item pointers ? How could
> autovacuum let this happen ?

What PG version is this?

(The earlier autovacuum releases had some bugs with large tables, thus
the question...)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-03-24 19:43:15
Subject: Re: Preventing query from hogging server
Previous:From: Rosser SchwarzDate: 2005-03-24 19:24:12
Subject: Re: Preventing query from hogging server

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-03-24 19:35:42
Subject: Re: Upcoming 8.0.2 Release
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-03-24 18:37:11
Subject: Re: Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group