Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Hm. People have complained of that fact from time to time in normal
>> usage as well. Should we simply change SIGINT handling to allow it to
>> cancel an idle transaction?
> If this means that we would be able to able to easily rollback the
> current transaction of a backend stuck in "idle in transaction"
> status, a big +1.
Yes, I have had clients caught by this regularly (last time less than a
week ago), it would be a significant enhancement.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-11-28 18:48:38|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new |
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2008-11-28 18:33:54|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard
server certificates to the new|