Re: Function C and INOUT parameters

From: Ben Ali Rachid <souliman239(at)yahoo(dot)fr>
To: stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
Date: 2009-03-24 20:09:36
Message-ID: 491051.90371.qm@web28504.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks ! Now, it works fine.

Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Personally I'm of the opinion we should eliminate most of these

> duplicative mailing lists like -performance and -interfaces and just

> use -general. I don't see that having multiple lists for user

> questions helps either the users or the answerers due to just this

> type of problem.

In any case, this list has more success than 'interfaces list' (prompt and efficient responses).

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-24 20:17:18 pgsql: Implement "fastupdate" support for GIN indexes, in which we try
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2009-03-24 19:14:13 Re: hstore patch, part 2