Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Decreasing WAL size effects

From: Kyle Cordes <kyle(at)kylecordes(dot)com>
To: pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Jason Long <mailing(dot)list(at)supernovasoftware(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Decreasing WAL size effects
Date: 2008-10-31 04:32:59
Message-ID: 490A8A7B.1070107@kylecordes.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Jason Long wrote:

> Sure I would rather have synchronous WAL shipping, but  if that is going 
> to be a while or synchronous would slow down my applicaton I  can get 
> comfortably close enough for my purposes with some highly compressible 
> WALs.

I'm way out here on the outskirts (just a user with a small pile of 
servers running PG)... I would also find any improvements in WAL 
shipping helpful, between now and when continuous streaming is ready.


-- 
Kyle Cordes
http://kylecordes.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2008-10-31 05:18:08
Subject: can we create a record of more than one field?
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2008-10-31 03:05:43
Subject: Re: BufferAccessStrategy for bulk insert

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Craig RingerDate: 2008-10-31 07:06:27
Subject: Re: Decreasing WAL size effects
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-10-31 03:43:05
Subject: Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group