Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Yeah, a magical OID clearly has some issues. A new field in pg_cast is
>> the obvious alternative. How about adding a "castmethod" char field,
>> with values:
>> b = binary-compatible cast (CREATE CAST ... WITHOUT FUNCTION)
>> i = I/O coercion cast (the new beast, CREATE CAST ... WITH INOUT)
>> f = use cast function specified in castfunc field.
>> castfunc is 0 for methods b and i.
> Seems sane to me. If you do that, please add a check in the opr_sanity
> regression test that castfunc is nonzero if and only if castmethod is f.
Ok, will do.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2008-10-30 13:48:54|
|Subject: Re: Please make sure your patches are on the wiki page|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-10-30 13:37:37|
|Subject: Re: User defined I/O conversion casts |