Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]

From: Melanie <melanie(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To:
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]
Date: 2008-10-29 12:43:05
Message-ID: 49085A59.7070903@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

I read Roberts email as a bit of a sarcastic joke, but, hey, maybe I'm
being a Pollyanna, you guys know each other better.

For what it's worth, I think it was me that was confused as to what list
became moderated. I got confused by what was going on with the mailing
list on .us and thought I would not be able to send a "non-delayed"
email to that list for a question. I was wrong. I apologize to you
folks for my confusion leading to this conversation.

Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Robert Treat
> <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
>> +1 for kicking you guys off. I've always thought this arrangement would lead
>> to confusion, and I doubt this will be the only time. The distinctions Alvaro
>> laid out are clear, and I think we should go with them.
>>
>
> How exactly is it confusing? What's more confusing is that we have
> some 'regional' groups that claim to be language specific (eg. French)
> and some that are geographically based (eg. Italy). We use a different
> naming convention for the PG.EU and PG.US lists for exactly that
> reason.
>
> In any case, the extent to which you'd be 'kicking anyone off' would
> simply be to change the domain name - all the services for both
> domains are managed by the same team on the same infrastructure
> anyway.
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2008-10-29 13:10:17 Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-10-29 08:53:37 Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]