Thanks JD - I didn't realize that and so since the list I was aware of
having signed up for was the .us one, I assumed it was the same. thanks
for the clarification! :-)
Selena Deckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Melanie wrote:
>>> Since the .us list is now slowed down by being a moderated list, I want to
>>> confirm before friday that the deletion of my(and whomever else's) email
>>> address and then it being readded, did not ALSO result in my vote being
>>> deleted. I just assume I don't need to vote again and want to confirm.
>> pgus-general is not a moderated list. The members@ list is. The members@
>> list is meant to be an announce list which is why it is moderated.
> Melanie was talking about the postgresql.us mailing list - which she
> indicated above.
> Perhaps you meant to name that list members-announce(at)postgresql(dot)us?
> The impression you gave me by simply calling it 'members' is that this
> is a list designed to bring people together, which doesn't work very
> well when we can't talk to each other.
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2008-10-28 15:17:03|
|Subject: Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator
|Previous:||From: Selena Deckelmann||Date: 2008-10-28 14:59:18|
|Subject: Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]|