Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> In that case, why not put the trigger in core so people can use it
>> One advantage of making it a contrib module is that discussing how/when
>> to use it would fit more easily into the structure of the
>> documentation. There is no place in our docs that a "standard trigger"
>> would fit without seeming like a wart; but a contrib module can document
>> itself pretty much however it wants.
> I was thinking a new section on 'trigger functions' of the functions
> and operators chapter, linked from the 'create trigger' page. That
> doesn't seem like too much of a wart.
There seems to be a preponderance of opinion for doing this as a
builtin. Here is a patch that does it that way, along with docs and
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2008-10-22 18:56:53|
|Subject: Re: minimal update|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2008-10-22 18:08:52|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol forhot standby.|