Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> In that case, why not put the trigger in core so people can use it
> One advantage of making it a contrib module is that discussing how/when
> to use it would fit more easily into the structure of the
> documentation. There is no place in our docs that a "standard trigger"
> would fit without seeming like a wart; but a contrib module can document
> itself pretty much however it wants.
I was thinking a new section on 'trigger functions' of the functions and
operators chapter, linked from the 'create trigger' page. That doesn't
seem like too much of a wart.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2008-10-21 14:15:12|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby utility and administrator functions|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2008-10-21 14:10:16|
|Subject: Re: corrupted pg_proc?|