Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Interval output bug in HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interval output bug in HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
Date: 2008-10-02 17:11:10
Message-ID: 48E500AE.2000408@cheapcomplexdevices.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, bug all the way back --- applied.
> I don't much like the forced rounding to two digits here, but changing
> that doesn't seem like material for back-patching.  Are you going to
> fix that up while working on your other patches?

Gladly.  I hate that too.

I think I can also re-factor some of the copy-paste there
to remove about 200 lines of code duplicated between the interval
styles.   I'll get this one in there as well, and try posting
a cleanup patch tonight.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Aidan Van DykDate: 2008-10-02 17:19:16
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-10-02 17:07:31
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group