Re: W2K8

From: Raul Carolus <raul(dot)carolus(at)dealerbuilt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: W2K8
Date: 2008-10-02 14:27:34
Message-ID: 48E4DA56.7000506@dealerbuilt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

We have a server running in our test environment under 2k8 and it is
working for what we need to. It's not under heavy load, though. We
have quite a few 2k3 64bit installations that postgres keeps on keepin' on.

-Raul Carolus

Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Howard Cole <howardnews(at)selestial(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think it does. It certaily works on w2k3 x64 and it should work on w2k8
>>> on x86. I haven't heard a specific report about it working on w2k8 x64,
>>> but
>>> since I have heard no report that it *doesn't* work, I think you can
>>> safely
>>> assume that it works :-)
>>>
>> Thanks Magnus, Dave. On those assertive confirmations I shall get one
>> ordered! I'll assume you'll pay the bill to revert to W2k3 if it doesn't ;)
>
> Probably not - but I am actually installing 2k8 x64 to do some
> benchmarking right now. If you want to hold off for a day or so until
> it's running and tested, I can let you know if it seems OK. I
> seriously doubt there will be any issues though - we know it works on
> Vista which is largely the same under the hood.
>

In response to

  • Re: W2K8 at 2008-10-02 13:11:49 from Dave Page

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Terenzio 2008-10-02 14:28:55 tsearch2 query
Previous Message Reg Me Please 2008-10-02 14:25:19 Re: Transactions within a function body