Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: dedicated server & postgresql 8.1 conf tunning

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Tommy Gildseth <tommy(dot)gildseth(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>
Cc: paul(at)wayr(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dedicated server & postgresql 8.1 conf tunning
Date: 2008-10-02 09:07:43
Message-ID: 48E48F5F.6050703@archonet.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Tommy Gildseth wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>> paul(at)wayr(dot)org wrote:
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Unfornatly, i can't update pgsql to 8.3 since it's not in debian stable.
>>
>> That's why backports.org was invented :-)
>> Or does can't mean "not allowed to"?
> 
> Well, running production servers from backports can be a risky
> proposition too, and can land you in situations like the one discussed
> in "Debian packages for Postgres 8.2" from the General list.

Well, there's a reason why "stable" is a popular choice for production
servers. I must admit that I build from source for my PostgreSQL
packages (because I care which version I run). I was reading one of the
Perl fellows recommending the same.

-- 
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Віталій ТимчишинDate: 2008-10-02 09:42:15
Subject: Delete performance again
Previous:From: Thomas SprengDate: 2008-10-02 08:37:30
Subject: Re: dedicated server & postgresql 8.1 conf tunning

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group