Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends
Date: 2008-09-30 12:45:48
Message-ID: 48E21F7C.1070107@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Question for the slow readers: this new FSM scheme being dynamic, it's no 
> longer possible to have table bloat, right?
> (where table bloat is full of dead-for-any-transaction tuples, and you have to 
> CLUSTER or VACUUM FULL to be able to reuse the space it takes)

No, it didn't change that. Regular VACUUMing or autovacuum is still needed.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zdenek KotalaDate: 2008-09-30 12:49:26
Subject: Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends
Previous:From: Gurjeet SinghDate: 2008-09-30 12:45:37
Subject: Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group