Re: Proposal: move column defaults into pg_attribute along with attacl

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Markus Wanner <markus(dot)wanner(at)programmfabrik(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: move column defaults into pg_attribute along with attacl
Date: 2008-09-29 07:05:00
Message-ID: 48E07E1C.8030307@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Markus Wanner (markus(dot)wanner(at)programmfabrik(dot)de) wrote:
>> What does the subobject column for pg_shdepend buy us?
>
> Tracking column-level ACL dependencies rather than having those
> dependencies only be at the table-level. This complicates
> pg_shdepend some, but simplifies the dependency handling in the
> ACL area and in handling table/column drops.

With a separate table? Or as part of pg_attribute (which can handle NULL
and VARLENA attributes now?)

Regards

Markus Wanner

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2008-09-29 07:55:34 Re: Null row vs. row of nulls in plpgsql
Previous Message tomas 2008-09-29 06:46:31 Re: Ad-hoc table type?