Re: Slow updates, poor IO

From: John Huttley <John(at)mib-infotech(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slow updates, poor IO
Date: 2008-09-29 03:08:51
Message-ID: 48E046C3.2080001@mib-infotech.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Ah yess... actually I can get the Kingston stuff locally.
However at the moment I'm happily married and want to keep it that way!

Everything is in pairs too. Actually its a lot cheaper than when it
first came out, but still
a lot more than your corner shop DDR-2 stuff.

--John

Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:01 PM, John Huttley <John(at)mib-infotech(dot)co(dot)nz> wrote:
>
>> Ahh bugger, I've just trashed my test setup.
>> I've settled on 64Mb shared memory since I've only got 1Gb or RAM and the
>> system impact of 256M is severe.
>> Also it uses FB-DIMMS which cost arm+leg+first born
>>
>
> http://www.crucial.com/search/searchresults.aspx?keywords=buffered
>
> Fully buffered memory there is $56.99 for a 1 Gig stick. That's
> hardly an arm and a leg. Considering many pgsql DBAs make that in 1
> to 3 hours, it's not much at all really. A lot cheaper than pulling
> your hair out trying to make a db server run on 1 Gig.
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2008-09-29 03:41:03 Re: Slow updates, poor IO
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2008-09-29 02:15:05 Re: Slow updates, poor IO