This topic really doesn't belong on -hackers, does it? Surely it belongs
either on the pgfoundry admins list, or the sysadmins list, or the -www
list or some such.
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2008, at 14:02, Joshua Drake wrote:
>> I think one problem we have right now, is nobody knows what it is going
>> to take. I would expect that our current version is sufficiently old
>> enough to cause some migration pain?
>> I know we have two members willing to help that are not Stefan and I.
>> Which is good, but this doesn't appear to be a small project.
> Does anyone know what needs to be done? If so, and you'd like to reply
> with a list of tasks, I can put in a little time this week and maybe
> next starting down that road. If it's a big job, I likely can't do it
> all myself, but I'm certainly happy to help out!
> --Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Benedek László||Date: 2008-09-24 22:16:52|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump roles support|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2008-09-24 21:44:19|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Subtransaction commits and Hot Standby|