Re: Do we really need a 7.4.22 release now?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really need a 7.4.22 release now?
Date: 2008-09-21 03:47:53
Message-ID: 48D5C3E9.4080409@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Are we ready enough to actually put a *timeline* on the website?
>
>> I would think so. IMO:
>> 3 years - Maintenance mode only
>> 5 years - End of life
>
> I'm not really in favor of a one-size-fits-all approach to this.
> Our various releases have had different levels of uptake and don't
> necessarily all deserve the same support lifespan.
>
> Case in point: we already obsoleted 8.0 and 8.1 for our Windows users.
> How sensible is it to argue that they'll deserve a lifespan equivalent
> to 8.2's?

I believe those are different arguments though. The Windows product is
still a relatively young and immature release. Our nix product is not.
Besides there is always an exception to the rule :).

I have no problem with, unless otherwise specified...

>
> The above numbers seem reasonable as a rough guideline, but I think the
> actual decisions will need to be taken on a release-by-release basis.
>

Nod.

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-09-21 04:46:27 Re: Foreign key constraint for array-field?
Previous Message David Fetter 2008-09-21 03:46:45 Re: Foreign key constraint for array-field?