Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Binaries vs Source

From: Naz <lists(at)mrnaz(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Binaries vs Source
Date: 2008-09-09 18:41:15
Message-ID: 48C6C34B.6020907@mrnaz.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Joshua Drake wrote:
 > Oh.. actually I would find it very surprising if compile from source

Given that PG does not do in-place upgrades, I don't see a benefit to 
using binary packages. Upgrading a source install is as easy as 
upgrading a binary install given you have to do a dump/restore anyway.

Or am I missing something?


- Naz.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-09-09 20:19:29
Subject: Re: Wiki CSS
Previous:From: Joshua DrakeDate: 2008-09-09 18:06:19
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Ron MayerDate: 2008-09-10 00:32:07
Subject: Re: famous multi-process architectures
Previous:From: Joshua DrakeDate: 2008-09-09 18:06:19
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group