Re: Is this really really as designed or defined in some standard

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is this really really as designed or defined in some standard
Date: 2008-09-01 07:53:06
Message-ID: 48BB9F62.2060102@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> 2008/8/31 Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
>> It seems that we allow several function arguments to have same
>> name (or is it label :)
>>
>> hannu=# create or replace function ff(a int, a int) returns int language
>> plpgsql as $$begin return $1+$2; end;$$;
>> CREATE FUNCTION
>> hannu=# select ff(1,1);
>> ff
>> ----
>> 2
>> (1 row)
>>
>> hannu=# select ff(1,2);
>> ff
>> ----
>> 3
>> (1 row)
>>
>> hannu=# create or replace function ffa(a int, a int) returns int
>> language plpgsql as $$begin return a + a; end;$$;
>> CREATE FUNCTION
>> hannu=# select ffa(1,2);
>> ffa
>> -----
>> 2
>> (1 row)
>>
>> Is this defined by some standard or just an oversight ?
>>
>
> what is problem? You have two diferent functions. I don't see anything wrong.

Take a look at the second function again. It's certainly not behaviour
that I would expect :-) (I would expect a syntax error)

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Radek Strnad 2008-09-01 09:01:39 Re: WIP patch: Collation support
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-09-01 07:40:28 Re: Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal