Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: code coverage patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Korry Douglas <korry(dot)douglas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michelle Caisse <Michelle(dot)Caisse(at)sun(dot)com>
Subject: Re: code coverage patch
Date: 2008-08-28 15:03:08
Message-ID: 48B6BE2C.3040907@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> We're pretty much assuming bison anyway, no?  It's been years since
> I heard of anyone successfully building the backend grammar with plain
> yacc.

In my recollection, you were the last holdout on that with the 
occasional HP-UX yacc test.  But I seem to recall that that combination 
actually no longer worked the last time.

If no one else has any interest in maintaining other-yacc support, then 
we might as well drop it.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-08-28 15:09:51
Subject: Re: code coverage patch
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-08-28 15:02:03
Subject: Re: September Commit Fest coming soon!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group