Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: code coverage patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Korry Douglas <korry(dot)douglas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michelle Caisse <Michelle(dot)Caisse(at)sun(dot)com>
Subject: Re: code coverage patch
Date: 2008-08-28 14:00:21
Message-ID: 48B6AF75.7080106@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Korry Douglas wrote:
>> 1) Use bison's -o option to put the output file in the right place 
>> directly,
>> if we are dealing with bison (and don't bother to support code coverage
>> analysis with other yaccs), or
>>
>> 2) Run a pattern replacement across the grammar output files as their are
>> renamed.
> 
> Why not use the %output directive in the grammar file instead; that way 
> you don't need to add any special flags to the Makefile.

I think only bison supports that directive.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-08-28 14:24:10
Subject: Re: code coverage patch
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-08-28 13:32:45
Subject: Re: code coverage patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group