| From: | Benedek László <laci(at)benedekl(dot)tvnetwork(dot)hu> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump roles support |
| Date: | 2008-08-27 14:17:43 |
| Message-ID: | 48B56207.3080502@benedekl.tvnetwork.hu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
daveg wrote:
>> I created a patch to set the role to a specified name just after the db
>> connection.
>>
> I was going to do this, but you have beat me to it. You will want to update
> the sgml documentation, and pg_dumpall as well.
>
> -dg
>
>
Ok, here is the next one.
pg_dumpall now just passes the --role option to pg_dump. What do you
think, is it enough
or it should issue the SET ROLE TO ... command in its own session too?
Laszlo Benedek
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg_dump.role.patch | text/x-patch | 6.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-08-27 14:32:13 | Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-27 14:06:37 | Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? |