>> I created a patch to set the role to a specified name just after the db
> I was going to do this, but you have beat me to it. You will want to update
> the sgml documentation, and pg_dumpall as well.
Ok, here is the next one.
pg_dumpall now just passes the --role option to pg_dump. What do you
think, is it enough
or it should issue the SET ROLE TO ... command in its own session too?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2008-08-27 14:32:13|
|Subject: Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-08-27 14:06:37|
|Subject: Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? |