Hello,

daveg wrote:
>> I created a patch to set the role to a specified name just after the db
>> connection.
>>      
> I was going to do this, but you have beat me to it. You will want to update
> the sgml documentation, and pg_dumpall as well.
>
> -dg
>
>    
Ok, here is the next one.
pg_dumpall now just passes the --role option to pg_dump. What do you 
think, is it enough
or it should issue the SET ROLE TO ... command in its own session too?

Laszlo Benedek

In response to

• Re: pg_dump roles support at 2008-08-26 12:47:26 from Benedek László

Responses

• Re: pg_dump roles support at 2008-09-03 19:33:02 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Heikki Linnakangas	Date: 2008-08-27 14:32:13
	Subject: Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro?
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2008-08-27 14:06:37
	Subject: Re: Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro?