Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>> No, I'm not because if you think we should start tracking and listing
>>>> everyone that gives us five bucks then you clearly need to come in out
>>>> of the sun for a while :-).
>>> Why not? It's the best way to increase the number of people who give us
>> Well, someone giving three qualified answers to a mailing list inquiry
>> on a user list is worth a lot more than five bucks of their time, and
>> you surely don't want to include that in your listing.
> If we use money as the qualifier for sponsorships listing anything less
> than 5 - 10k is silly. We already provide thank you, hand shake, and
> general acknowledgment. Here is the thing, most of the people that
> contribute are already getting their return from:
Well, $2000 is a small amount for a corporation, but it's a very large
amount for an individual. I seriously think that donors like Gevik, who
gives us around $400 a year of his personal money in addition to
contributing time, deserve some extra recognition.
I agree that having a threshold for listing on the website is sensible,
I'd just like to have that threshold a little lower than you would.
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Sullivan||Date: 2008-08-22 17:59:00|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4279: Bad codepage in our web-site|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2008-08-22 17:46:53|
|Subject: Re: request for sponsors page|