Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Daniele Depetrini wrote:
>> Hi Again,
>> Any ideas?
> There is no auto-idle-close mechanism in the pool implementation
> provided by the driver.
> The connection pool shipped with the driver is very basic. If it
> doesn't do what you need it to, you probably want to use a 3rd party
> connection pool (e.g. dbcp). I don't think there's much point in
> building any sort of fully-featured connection pool to ship with the
> driver - there are plenty of other implementations already out there.
Thanks for the answer. Actually according to my testing up to now is
working "well enough". It's not clear to me if prepared statements
pooling is implemented: in positive case will be much better to use
internal pooling instead of an external one, what do you think?
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Oliver Jowett||Date: 2008-08-22 23:23:47|
|Subject: Re: Error selecting constant|
|Previous:||From: Thomas Markus||Date: 2008-08-22 11:12:37|
|Subject: Re: Tracing SQL statements per page/request|