Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm

Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Am Tuesday, 29. July 2008 schrieb Greg Sabino Mullane:
>>> What's not stable about having Python 2.5?
>
>> I mean "stable" to mean "does not change (unnecessarily)".
>
> I really don't understand Peter's objection here. This thread has
> already consumed more person-time than I spent on applying the
> back-patch. I note also that, in fact, the code that was wrong was
> wrong according to pre-2.5 python as well. It accidentally failed
> to fail on common architectures, but it was certainly doing things
> that are undefined according to the C standard. So in my eyes this
> was a bug fix.

I see. if it is small patch and also fix other problems it seems to me as
reasonable change.

Zdenek

--
Zdenek Kotala Sun Microsystems
Prague, Czech Republic http://sun.com/postgresql