Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723
Date: 2008-07-28 23:09:08
Message-ID: 488E5194.9060908@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> My thought is that we could optimize away materialization in cases where
> we can tell it's not needed (no volatile functions and/or no multiple
> scans of the subquery).  But not being able to do it means we've
> implemented the feature incorrectly.
>
> 			
>   

I'm not sure how much work that would involve, but none of this means we 
can't have the feature for 8.4, right? Just that there is more work to do.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-07-28 23:13:20
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-07-28 23:04:14
Subject: Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-07-28 23:18:14
Subject: Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-07-28 23:04:14
Subject: Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group