Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> ISTM that Tom's objection is really that citext is a hack, and that it
>> will actually make it harder for us to get to a collation-based case
>> insensitive comparison.
> Well, it won't make it harder to implement collations; but I worry that
> people who have been relying on the citext syntax will have a hard time
> migrating to collations. Perhaps if someone did the legwork to
> determine exactly what that conversion would look like, it would assuage
> the fear.
I kind of assumed we would do it by implementing the COLLATE clause of
the CREATE DOMAIN statement.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-07-28 19:49:21|
|Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
|Previous:||From: Andrew Gierth||Date: 2008-07-28 19:35:26|
|Subject: Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723|