Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> I also suggested having three options
>> so we could ask for any or all parts in the one dump. --data-only and
>> --schema-only are negative options so don't allow this.
>> (I don't like those names either, just thinking about capabilities)
> Maybe invert the logic?
> Not wedded to these either, just tossing out an idea...
Please, no. Negative logic seems likely to cause endless confusion.
I'd even be happier with --schema-part-1 and --schema-part-2 if we can't
find some more expressive way of designating them.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2008-07-21 15:23:39|
|Subject: Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit|
|Previous:||From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz||Date: 2008-07-21 15:09:28|
|Subject: Re: overlaps performance|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2008-07-21 15:28:30|
|Subject: Re: Is autovacuum doing a wraparound-avoiding VACUUM?|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2008-07-21 14:41:25|
|Subject: Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721|