That's no problem and it makes a lot of sense. I will prepare a patch
for the documentation.
Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> You probably need to say a whole lot more about this patch.
>> I've updated the wiki with things I've learned while submitting patches.
> Anybody mind if I update that to put more emphasis on the need for
> documentation? As in "documentation patches are *required* if
> your patch adds or changes user-visible behavior"?
> regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Marko Kreen||Date: 2008-06-28 09:59:18|
|Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-06-27 22:27:15|
|Subject: Re: Explain XML patch |