Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> This proposal strikes me as half-baked. Either we need proper and full
>> support for variadic functions, or we don't, but I don't think we need
>> syntactic sugar like the above (or maybe in this case it's really
>> syntactic saccharine).
> What would you consider "proper and full support"?
I don't know. But this doesn't feel like it.
I'm not even sure it's possible to so in any sane way alongside overloading.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2008-06-23 22:51:28|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch for Prevent pg_dump/pg_restore
from being affected by statement_timeout|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2008-06-23 21:35:43|
|Subject: Re: Database owner installable modules patch|