Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: variadic function support

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: variadic function support
Date: 2008-06-23 22:01:04
Message-ID: 48601D20.3040106@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>   
>> This proposal strikes me as half-baked. Either we need proper and full 
>> support for variadic functions, or we don't, but I don't think we need 
>> syntactic sugar like the above (or maybe in this case it's really 
>> syntactic saccharine).
>>     
>
> What would you consider "proper and full support"?
>
> 			
>   

I don't know. But this doesn't feel like it. 

I'm not even sure it's possible to so in any sane way alongside overloading.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-06-23 22:51:28
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch for Prevent pg_dump/pg_restore from being affected by statement_timeout
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-06-23 21:35:43
Subject: Re: Database owner installable modules patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group