Tom Lane wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> 2008/6/4 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>>> Huh? That's completely nonsensical ... where will you determine the
>>> type of the array, if you don't have a sample element?
>> it is nonsens in current postgres. But null array is castable to anyarray no?
> If you mean an array of nulls, it still has to have an element type.
Right, and since the fill element is thus not optional it should be in a
fixed position in the argument list, ISTM, which can only mean it would
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-06-04 20:37:18|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: new function array_init |
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2008-06-04 20:34:01|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: new function array_init|