Tom Lane wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>   
>> 2008/6/4 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>>     
>>> Huh?  That's completely nonsensical ... where will you determine the
>>> type of the array, if you don't have a sample element?
>>>       
>
>   
>> it is nonsens in current postgres. But null array is castable to anyarray no?
>>     
>
> If you mean an array of nulls, it still has to have an element type.
>
> 			
>   

Right, and since the fill element is thus not optional it should be in a 
fixed position in the argument list, ISTM, which can only mean it would 
come first.

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: Proposal: new function array_init at 2008-06-04 20:29:43 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2008-06-04 20:37:18
	Subject: Re: Proposal: new function array_init
Previous:	From: Pavel Stehule	Date: 2008-06-04 20:34:01
	Subject: Re: Proposal: new function array_init