Marko Kreen wrote:
> There is this tiny matter of replicating schema changes asynchronously,
> but I suspect nobody actually cares. Few random points about that:
>
I'm not sure I follow you - the Sybase 'warm standby' replication of
everything is really
useful for business continuity. The per-table rep is more effective for
publishing reference
data, but is painful to maintain.
Not having something that automagically reps a complete copy including
DDL (except
for temp tables) is a major weakness IMO.
James
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: James Mansion | Date: 2008-06-01 19:57:00 |
| Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous: | From: Zdenek Kotala | Date: 2008-06-01 19:03:26 |
| Subject: Re: Where can I find the doxyfile? |