Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: replication hooks

From: James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: replication hooks
Date: 2008-06-01 19:48:06
Message-ID: 4842FCF6.10005@mansionfamily.plus.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marko Kreen wrote:
> There is this tiny matter of replicating schema changes asynchronously,
> but I suspect nobody actually cares.  Few random points about that:
>   
I'm not sure I follow you - the Sybase 'warm standby' replication of 
everything is really
useful for business continuity.  The per-table rep is more effective for 
publishing reference
data, but is painful to maintain.

Not having something that automagically reps a complete copy including 
DDL (except
for temp tables) is a major weakness IMO.

James


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: James MansionDate: 2008-06-01 19:57:00
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Zdenek KotalaDate: 2008-06-01 19:03:26
Subject: Re: Where can I find the doxyfile?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group