From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2008-05-31 15:14:48 |
Message-ID: | 48416B68.1060708@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
> Compression especially is going to negate one of the big advantages of
> wal shipping, namely that it is cheap investment in terms of load to
> the main. A gigabit link can ship a lot of log files, you can always
Who has a gigabit link between Dallas and Atlanta? That is the actual
problem here. Switch to Switch compression is a waste of time (if you
aren't running GiGE, what are you doing???).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-05-31 18:48:26 | Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-05-31 14:21:41 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-05-31 15:14:58 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
Previous Message | Jan Urbański | 2008-05-31 14:53:54 | Re: proposal: Preference SQL |